ABSTRACT
The Interdisciplinary Cardiac Arrest Research Review (ICARE) group was formed in 2018 to conduct an annual search of peer-reviewed literature relevant to cardiac arrest. Now in its fourth year, the goals of this review are to highlight annual updates on clinically relevant and impactful clinical and population-level studies in the interdisciplinary world of cardiac arrest research from 2021. To achieve these goals, a search of PubMed using keywords related to clinical research in cardiac arrest was conducted. Titles and s were screened for relevance and sorted into seven categories: Epidemiology & Public Health;Prehospital Resuscitation;In-Hospital Resuscitation & Post-Arrest Care;Prognostication & Outcomes;Pediatrics;Interdisciplinary Guidelines;and Coronavirus disease 2019. Screened manuscripts underwent standardized scoring of methodological quality and impact by reviewer teams lead by a subject matter expert editor. Articles scoring higher than 99t h per-centile by category were selected for full critique. Systematic differences between editors' and reviewers' scores were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A total of 4,730 articles were identified on initial search;of these, 1,677 were scored after screening for relevance and deduplication. Compared to the 2020 ICARE review, this represents a relative increase of 32% and 63%, respectively. Ultimately, 44 articles underwent full critique. The leading category was In-Hospital Resuscitation, representing 41% of fully reviewed articles, followed by Pre-hospital Resuscitation (20%) and Interdisciplinary Guidelines (16%). In conclusion, several clinically relevant studies in 2021 have added to the evidence base for the management of cardiac arrest patients including implementation and incorporation of resuscitation systems, technology, and quality improvement programs to improve resuscitation. © 2023 Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
ABSTRACT
Introduction The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 triggered reorganisation of hospital departments around the world as resources were configured to prioritise critical care. In spring 2020, NHS England issued national guidance proposing acceptable time intervals for postponing different types of surgical procedures for patients with cancer and other conditions. The 'Consider-19' study sought to investigate prioritisation decisions in practice, with in-depth examination of colorectal cancer surgery as a case-study, given recommendations that these procedures could be delayed by up to 12 weeks. Methods Twenty-seven semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals between June - November 2020. A key informant sampling approach was used, followed by snowballing to achieve maximum regional variation across the UK. Data were analysed thematically using the constant comparison approach. Results Interviewees reported a spectrum of perceived disruption to colorectal cancer surgery services in the early phase of the pandemic, with some services reporting greater scarcity of resources than others. Nonetheless, all reported a need to prioritise patients based on local judgments. Prioritisation was framed by many as unfamiliar territory, requiring significant deliberation and emotional effort. Whilst national guidance provided a framework for prioritising, it was largely left to local teams to devise processes for prioritising within surgical specialities and then between different specialities, resulting in much local variation in practice. Discussion The pandemic necessitated a significant change in practice as surgeons, in a tense and uncertain situation, found themselves having to navigate clinically, emotionally, and ethically- charged decisions about how best to use limited surgical resources. Whilst unavoidable, many felt uncomfortable with the task and the consequences for their patients. The findings point to a need to better support surgeons tasked with prioritising patients and raise questions about who should be involved in this activity.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The Interdisciplinary Cardiac Arrest Research Review (ICARE) group was formed in 2018 to conduct an annual search of peer-reviewed literature relevant to cardiac arrest. Now in its third year, the goals of the review are to highlight annual updates in the interdisciplinary world of clinical cardiac arrest research with a focus on clinically relevant and impactful clinical and population-level studies from 2020. Methods: A search of PubMed using keywords related to clinical research in cardiac arrest was conducted. Titles and abstracts were screened for relevance and sorted into 7 categories: Epidemiology & Public Health Initiatives; Prehospital Resuscitation, Technology & Care; In-Hospital Resuscitation & Post-Arrest Care; Prognostication & Outcomes; Pediatrics; Interdisciplinary Guidelines & Reviews; and a new section dedicated to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Screened manuscripts underwent standardized scoring of methodological quality and impact on the respective fields by reviewer teams lead by a subject matter expert editor. Articles scoring higher than 99 percentiles by category were selected for full critique. Systematic differences between editors' and reviewers' scores were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: A total of 3594 articles were identified on initial search; of these, 1026 were scored after screening for relevance and deduplication, and 51 underwent full critique. The leading category was Prehospital Resuscitation, Technology & Care representing 35% (18/51) of fully reviewed articles. Four COVID-19 related articles were included for formal review that was attributed to a relative lack of high-quality data concerning cardiac arrest and COVID-19 specifically by the end of the 2020 calendar year. No significant differences between editor and reviewer scoring were found among review articles (P = 0.697). Among original research articles, section editors scored a median 1 point (interquartile range, 0-3; P < 0.01) less than reviewers. Conclusions: Several clinically relevant studies have added to the evidence base for the management of cardiac arrest patients including methods for prognostication of neurologic outcome following arrest, airway management strategy, timing of coronary intervention, and methods to improve expeditious performance of key components of resuscitation such as chest compressions in adults and children.
ABSTRACT
Introduction In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, state and local governments implemented mitigation strategies, including lockdowns, thereby averting the typical fall/winter 2020 bronchiolitis season and reducing the incidence of respiratory viruses, such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Florida implemented a strict lockdown from April 1, 2020, to April 30, 2020. The removal of lockdown precautions on September 25, 2020, was followed by an atypical out-of-season surge of bronchiolitis in April 2021. Anecdotally, this surge appeared to be associated with both increased poly-viral coinfections and disease severity. Objective To determine if the bronchiolitis out-of-season surge differed from historical seasonal case patterns. Methods A single-center retrospective cohort study of admissions to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes of bronchiolitis, from December 9, 2019, to February 29, 2020 (12 weeks, pre-lockdown group or PreLD), was compared to March 29, 2021, to June 19, 2021 (12 weeks, post-lockdown group or PostLD). Variables used for comparison were gender, ethnicity, age, viral coinfections, viruses detected, PICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, mortality, maximum respiratory support needed, mechanical ventilation days, extracorporeal life support (ECLS) days, and severity of disease measured by Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2) and Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA). Categorical data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, and a t-test was used for continuous variables. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results A total of 135 subjects were analyzed from the two cohorts. More patients were admitted during the PostLD phase (87 vs. 48). The PostLD group had a higher age at admission (11.2 ± 12.3 vs. 6.6 ± 7.5, p = 0.0075), but there were no differences in gender or race/ethnicity. The PostLD group also exhibited a higher proportion of RSV infections (73 vs. 16, p < 0.0001) and poly-viral infections (p < 0.0001). Higher coronavirus OC43 (9 vs. 0, p = 0.0263) and parainfluenza types 1-4 (human parainfluenza virus (HPIV)) (19 vs. 1, p = 0.0017) detections, yet fewer human metapneumovirus (HMPV) detections (0 vs. 4, p = 0.0147), were observed PostLD. No differences were found in hospital length of stay, PICU length of stay, mortality, mechanical ventilation days, ECLS days, or severity of illness scores based on PELOD-2 or pSOFA scores. Conclusion In the bronchiolitis out-of-season surge, there were an increased number of admissions to the PICU. Those patients were older, and more likely to have RSV, as well as a coinfection with coronavirus OC43 or HPIV, yet less likely to have HMPV. No difference in length of stay or disease severity was demonstrated.
ABSTRACT
This research examines the extent to which parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) perceive support resources to be available, accessible, and/or effective in supporting their needs. A focus on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the availability and effectiveness of service delivery is included. A total of 35 parents in Ontario, Canada with a child aged 6-17 with ASD completed an online survey responding to questions about involvement in ASD services, use of formal and informal supports, important support needs, which needs were being met, and perceptions of unmet needs, all which were thematically analysed. The analysis demonstrates that parents experience multiple barriers in accessing supports, particularly from formal sources. Further, the barriers were heightened during the pandemic particularly in relation to the multiple role responsibilities that parents had to take on due to a discontinuity of support provision. Most of these parents put their own support needs aside to focus on their child, with the support their child receives directly relating to the ability to attend to their own needs. Parents identified challenges related to uncertain funding, limits of a one-size-fits-all model of support, and lengthy waitlists. Recommendations for family-centred care and the need for service coordinators to work with families to assist in navigating the complex support system are provided.